And
Shakespeare
I think Bob Dylan
is a lot like William Shakespeare. Here’s why:
They both get
into different head-spaces and riff poetically within them with complete
commitment and abandon.
They both
create many memorable characters but no one in a Shakespeare play or a Dylan
song is as interesting as Shakespeare or Dylan himself. It's like the author
becomes the thing of interest, not the pieces of the puzzle. In fact the pieces
of the puzzle, in total, seem to make up the multi-verse or parliament of the
author's worldview.
Dylan and
Shakespeare are also both innovative users of words. They change the way people
use language by the way they use language. Plus there is an embodied poetic
sensibility to almost everything they write.
They both
borrow from existing forms and plots and use them as templates to express their
art and as foundations to break new creative ground.
They also
both transcend their medium. To call Shakespeare a “playwright” or Dylan a
“songwriter” doesn’t do justice to what they do. The crazy and yet refined abandon
with which Dylan occupies creative space is not like many other
"songwriters". But to call him a poet is also inaccurate. My brother
once told me about a review in which he was called one of the most important
"users of words in the 20th century". I guess that's about right and
would work for Shakespeare too, whose work goes far beyond “playwright”.
nice piece Gene! yes, Dylan was a master 'wordsmith' & storyteller despite what one thinks of his 'singing' voice, as was Shakespeare (whomever the 'real Shakespeare was!) - & yes, both employed their craft w/ total involvement! Screenwriter/producer Jon Bono & currrently & hopefully only 'temporarily 'broke in my own unique existence! (& semi-LoL!).. ;) have a cool Dylan show!
ReplyDeleteThanks Jon! GB
Delete